Dedicated engineering teams
Add an Indonesia-based team to your product roadmap. Agree the roles, capacity, backlog, review process, and shared leadership allocation around the work you need to deliver.
↗From Indonesia. For what’s next.
Engineering teams.Built around you.
Build digital products, extend your engineering capacity, and connect everyday operations with practical automation and controlled AI assistance.
Start with a product goal or one workflow. Our wider website is coming soon.
01 / What we do
More capacity. A shared sense of direction.
For product teams that need capacity, businesses replacing manual work, and agencies looking for a delivery partner. We agree the problem, ownership, and scope before choosing the tools.
Web & mobile products
Turn a customer experience or business process into a scoped web or mobile product. Work through requirements, implementation, testing, and handover with clear acceptance criteria.
↗Technical leadership & delivery
Bring technical direction and project coordination into an existing engagement. Clarify architecture, reviews, priorities, and progress with an explicit shared-leadership allocation.
↗AI agents & workflow automation
Connect business tools, reduce repeated handoffs, and explore assistants for permitted information and tasks. From n8n workflows to scoped agent pilots, define access, review, and ownership before automation.
↗02 / Who we help
Different teams. A clear starting point.
Start with the responsibility you need help with. A product roadmap, agency engagement, or operational workflow has different owners and constraints.
Software agencies
Extend delivery without blurring ownership.
Discuss a delivery partnershipDiscuss extra capacity around an agreed client project. Define technical reviews, coordination, end-client contact rules and handover with your delivery lead before work starts.
Product & SaaS teams
More engineering capacity for a defined roadmap.
Discuss your product teamWork through roles, backlog, shared technical leadership and a review rhythm. Your product owner retains priorities and acceptance; team allocation and operating responsibilities stay explicit.
Business operations
Replace a manual handoff with a controlled workflow.
Explore an operations workflowMap the current process, tools, data owner and exception paths. Start with a scoped integration or assistant pilot instead of giving an agent unrestricted business-system access.
03 / Possible solutions
See the possibilities.
Illustrative examples, not completed client case studies. These show possible workflows; the right scope, tools, and success criteria are agreed during discovery.
Illustrative use case / Sales operations
From inquiry to a reviewed follow-up
Inquiries arrive across tools, details are copied manually, and the next action can get lost.
- 01 / Inquiry
- 02 / Brief
- 03 / Draft reply
- 04 / Human review
A scoped n8n workflow could collect approved fields, route the inquiry to an owner, and prepare a follow-up for review. Sending remains a separate authorized step.
Output to scope: workflow map, connector setup, retry rules, and a handover runbook.
Discuss this workflowIllustrative use case / Team knowledge
Answers from the right documents
People need an answer, but knowledge is spread across documents and not every source should be visible to everyone.
- 01 / Allowed sources
- 02 / Scoped search
- 03 / Cited draft
- 04 / Human review
Explore an assistant that answers from approved, access-scoped sources and shows citations. Dify or a custom implementation may fit, subject to deployment, licensing, and data requirements.
Output to scope: source inventory, access rules, answer evaluation, and a usable review interface.
Explore a knowledge assistantIllustrative use case / Assisted operations
An operations assistant with clear limits
Research, summaries, and routine coordination take time, but an assistant should not have unrestricted access to business systems.
- 01 / Agreed task
- 02 / Allowed tools
- 03 / Draft result
- 04 / Human review
Pilot Hermes Agent or OpenClaw with isolated execution and limited tools, or use LangGraph for a more tailored workflow. Business-critical actions stay behind explicit permissions and approval.
Output to scope: task boundaries, tool permissions, a tested pilot, and operating guidance.
Scope an agent pilotIllustrative use case / Product delivery
More capacity for a product roadmap
A product or agency team has work to deliver but needs additional engineering capacity and clear coordination.
- 01 / Agreed scope
- 02 / Build
- 03 / Review & test
- 04 / Handover
Agree an engineering team and shared leadership allocation around a defined backlog. Your product owner keeps priorities; delivery roles, reviews, and acceptance stay explicit.
Output to scope: delivery plan, reviewed implementation, test evidence, and source/runbook handover.
Discuss your delivery team04 / How we work
One team. Clear ownership.
Our delivery model brings client management and technical leadership together, so the dedicated engineering team can focus on execution.
Client & project lead
Your point of contact for priorities, scope, planning, and progress. The combined PM + Account Executive role keeps the work connected to your goals.
Technical lead
Technical direction, architecture, reviews, and engineering quality. Shared leadership with an explicit allocation for your engagement.
Your engineering team
An Indonesia-based team carrying out the agreed work, with the context and support needed to build, test, and improve your product.
You own the product priorities. Together, we define the scope, team, communication rhythm, and success criteria.
05 / Getting started
A clear start. A practical next step.
You do not need a finished technical specification to start a conversation. Bring the goal, the current process or product, and who owns the next decision.
01 / Understand
Discuss the problem
Map the goal, users, current tools, constraints, and decision owner. Identify what a useful first result would look like.
02 / Agree
Define a focused scope
Agree the team or pilot, access boundaries, deliverables, acceptance criteria, commercial terms, and responsibilities before work begins.
03 / Deliver
Build and review
Implement in reviewable steps, test the agreed flows, and keep decisions, blockers, and scope changes visible to the right people.
04 / Continue
Handover or extend
Review acceptance, document operation and ownership, and agree whether to hand over, iterate, or extend the engagement. Ongoing support is separately scoped.
What we make explicitScope & success criteriaAccess & approval rulesReview & test evidenceHandover & ownership
Start with your goal06 / Useful preparation
Prepare a useful first conversation.
You do not need to know every technical detail. Choose the starting point that resembles your need, then use the short guides or brief template to organize the conversation.
Capacity / Defined allocation
Ongoing product capacity
For a roadmap with recurring work. Discuss roles, allocation, shared leadership, priorities and collaboration rather than treating a team as a fixed-price project.
Plan engineering capacityBuild / Reviewable deliverables
A scoped product or integration
For a feature, application or system connection. Identify users, dependencies, exclusions and acceptance so the work can be proposed and reviewed clearly.
Discuss a product buildPilot / Evaluate before expanding
One workflow or assistant pilot
For one repeatable process or knowledge task. Begin with approved examples, clear tool/data boundaries and evidence for deciding whether automation is useful.
Scope a practical pilotBefore an automation pilot
- Name one process and its decision owner. Explain what is repeated today.
- List the systems, approved inputs and access restrictions. Do not share keys or production records.
- Describe exceptions and which actions must stay subject to human approval.
- Agree how you will review reliability and usefulness using representative, permitted examples.
- Decide who will operate the workflow, review failures and own changes after handover.
Before extending your engineering team
- Identify the product owner, priorities and the backlog or brief to start from.
- Map the roles you need and distinguish dedicated engineering from shared leadership.
- Review permitted repository/system access, onboarding dependencies and existing team responsibilities.
- Agree reviews, acceptance criteria, communication rhythm and working-hour constraints.
- Clarify documentation, ownership and support boundaries before starting the engagement.
A short brief, without the blank-page problem.
Use an editable plain-text outline for goals, current tools, scope, approvals and operating responsibility. Free to read or download; no inquiry form is required.
Practical material, without a form gate.
Use these plain-text resources to ask better questions and see how ownership, review and progress could be made explicit. They are preparation aids and illustrative templates, not client evidence or agreements.
Checklist / Delivery partnership
Evaluate the partnership, not just capacity
Clarify end-client contact, engineering reviews, access, scope changes and handover before agreeing a delivery partnership.
Download partner checklistChecklist / Controlled pilot
Check whether a workflow is ready to automate
Identify the owner, baseline, permitted inputs, approval boundaries and exception paths before expanding automation or AI assistance.
Download automation checklistIllustrative template / Progress reporting
A reviewable progress update
See a possible structure for reviewable work, decisions, blockers and scope changes. This blank illustrative template is not a real client report.
Download report example07 / The people behind JWDT
Technical depth. Human connection.
Doni Wicaksono
Founder & Head of Engineering
Technical direction and engineering quality, connecting product goals with practical architecture and implementation.
Andi Primaretha
Co-Founder & Head of Client Partnerships & Delivery
Client priorities connected to project execution through partnerships, scope, communication, and delivery planning.
Akhmad Yani
Director
Ideas, out in the world
A little of what we’re building.
Explore our apps on Google Play.
08 / Before we talk
A few useful answers.
Clarity before commitment. The details of an engagement are agreed around your actual needs, not a one-size-fits-all package.
Can I start with one workflow or a small pilot?
Yes. Start with one well-defined problem, an accountable owner, and a reviewable success criterion. We can discuss a focused pilot before a broader product or automation programme.
Do I need to choose a platform first?
No. We start with the workflow and constraints. n8n may fit integration work, Dify a knowledge assistant, LangGraph a custom agent workflow, and Hermes Agent or OpenClaw a controlled assistant pilot. Access, deployment, licensing, and ownership shape the selection.
Can you work with our existing systems and team?
We assess available APIs, permitted data, technical constraints, and the responsibilities of your existing team. An integration or delivery partnership is scoped around what can actually be accessed and supported.
Will AI act without approval?
Permissions and review boundaries are part of the scope. AI can prepare drafts or assist permitted work; sending messages, publishing, financial commitments, access changes, and sensitive people decisions require appropriate authorization and human review.
How are scope, pricing, and ongoing support agreed?
They depend on complexity, integrations, team allocation, data/security requirements, delivery boundaries, and operating responsibility. The proposal defines inclusions, exclusions, acceptance, and support rather than promising a fixed outcome before discovery.
What should I include in an inquiry?
A short goal, your current process or product, the tools involved, and any timing constraints are enough to begin. Please leave out credentials, confidential client files, and sensitive personal information.
09 / Start a conversation
What are you building next?
Tell us what you want to build, improve, or automate. We start by understanding the need, then discuss the team, scope, and next step that could fit.
Helpful context: your goal, current tools or process, decision owner, and any timing constraints. A short brief is enough; no confidential files or credentials are needed.